Immigrants from Uganda vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Costa Rican
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Costa Ricans
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,509,533 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 5.5% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 69.6% |
Range | 61.2% | 63.1% |
Mean | 22.5% | 25.8% |
Median | 19.7% | 22.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 18.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 30.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Costa Ricans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |