Mexican American Indian vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Costa Rican
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Costa Ricans
23.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 315,510,714 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382 and weighted average of 23.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 12.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 7.7% | 6.5% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 69.6% |
| Range | 67.3% | 63.1% |
| Mean | 32.2% | 25.8% |
| Median | 29.8% | 22.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.5% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.6% | 30.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 13.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Marshallese (23.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.53%), Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |