Immigrants from South America vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Costa Rican
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Costa Ricans
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South America vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,439,671 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 3.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South America | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 9.4% | 6.5% |
| Maximum | 30.0% | 69.6% |
| Range | 20.6% | 63.1% |
| Mean | 19.1% | 25.8% |
| Median | 19.0% | 22.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 30.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 13.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.030%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |