Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Costa Rican
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Costa Ricans
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Costa Rican Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,303,700 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.077 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 6.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sierra Leone | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 6.5% |
| Maximum | 52.1% | 69.6% |
| Range | 50.2% | 63.1% |
| Mean | 17.6% | 25.8% |
| Median | 17.4% | 22.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.7% | 30.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 13.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Albanian (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |