Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Carpatho Rusyn Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,926,469 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,607,667 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 29.2%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Eastern Asia	Carpatho Rusyn
Minimum	0.63%	0.39%
Maximum	14.6%	8.8%
Range	14.0%	8.4%
Mean	5.8%	3.7%
Median	5.1%	3.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.5%	1.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.9%	5.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.4%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.4%	2.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.4%	2.2%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Sri Lankan (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Cameroon	77.3 /100 \| #151	Good 5.0%
Albanians	77.2 /100 \| #152	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	76.3 /100 \| #153	Good 5.0%
Delaware	73.7 /100 \| #154	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	72.4 /100 \| #155	Good 5.1%
Sri Lankans	72.2 /100 \| #156	Good 5.1%
Argentineans	70.7 /100 \| #157	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	70.4 /100 \| #158	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	70.3 /100 \| #159	Good 5.1%
Pennsylvania Germans	68.5 /100 \| #160	Good 5.1%
Ethiopians	68.1 /100 \| #161	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Jordan	66.5 /100 \| #162	Good 5.1%
Sierra Leoneans	64.1 /100 \| #163	Good 5.1%
Hawaiians	62.3 /100 \| #164	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	62.2 /100 \| #165	Good 5.1%

Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Lithuanian (4.0%, a difference of 0.51%), Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 3.7%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 3.8%
Swedes	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 3.9%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 3.9%
Latvians	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 3.9%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 3.9%
Croatians	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 3.9%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 3.9%
Lithuanians	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 4.0%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 4.0%
Czechs	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 4.0%
Slovaks	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 4.0%
Poles	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 4.0%
Germans	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 4.0%
Filipinos	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 4.0%