Immigrants from South Africa vs Turkish Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,245,302 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 4.8%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Africa	Turkish
Minimum	0.91%	0.67%
Maximum	44.9%	22.9%
Range	44.0%	22.2%
Mean	11.5%	10.0%
Median	9.9%	9.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.9%	7.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.2%	12.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.3%	5.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.3%	4.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.1%	4.8%

Similar Demographics by Female Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.13%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Finns	96.4 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 12.4%
English	96.1 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 12.4%
Immigrants \| Denmark	95.8 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 12.4%
Belgians	95.8 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 12.4%
Czechoslovakians	95.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 12.4%
Immigrants \| Egypt	95.5 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	95.4 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants \| South Africa	95.4 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 12.5%
British	95.2 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 12.5%
Australians	95.2 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 12.5%
Native Hawaiians	95.1 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 12.5%
Romanians	95.1 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants \| Latvia	94.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 12.5%
Tlingit-Haida	94.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants \| China	94.5 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 12.5%

Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Immigrants \| Poland	99.3 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 11.8%
Macedonians	99.3 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 11.8%
Czechs	99.2 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 11.9%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.2 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 11.9%
Koreans	99.2 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 11.9%
Tongans	99.2 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 11.9%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.2 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 11.9%
Turks	99.2 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 11.9%
Asians	99.1 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 11.9%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 11.9%
Immigrants \| Romania	99.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 12.0%
Slovenes	98.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 12.0%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 12.0%
Immigrants \| Croatia	98.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 12.0%
Immigrants \| Austria	98.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 12.0%