Immigrants from South Africa vs Immigrants from Israel Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Immigrants from Israel
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Immigrants from Israel
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
92.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Immigrants from Israel Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,245,302 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,961,688 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Immigrants from Israel |
Minimum | 0.91% | 0.44% |
Maximum | 44.9% | 37.4% |
Range | 44.0% | 37.0% |
Mean | 11.5% | 11.1% |
Median | 9.9% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Immigrants from Israel by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |