Lebanese vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lebanese
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Lebanese
Turks
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
55.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lebanese vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,241,772 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 12.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lebanese | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 40.3% | 22.9% |
| Range | 38.9% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 16.6% | 10.0% |
| Median | 14.0% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Lebanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |