Immigrants from South Africa vs Egyptian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Egyptian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Egyptians
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Egyptian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,245,302 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,729,469 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Egyptian |
Minimum | 0.91% | 0.56% |
Maximum | 44.9% | 66.9% |
Range | 44.0% | 66.4% |
Mean | 11.5% | 12.4% |
Median | 9.9% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Egyptians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Serbian (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (12.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |