Immigrants from Albania vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Albania
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Albania
Turks
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Albania vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,347,063 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Albania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 11.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Albania | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.46% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 22.1% | 22.9% |
| Range | 21.6% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 12.0% | 10.0% |
| Median | 11.7% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Albania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Albania are Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |