Danish vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Danish
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Danes
Turks
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,673,857 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 22.9% |
| Range | 48.6% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 10.0% |
| Median | 11.2% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Cypriot (11.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Polish (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Iran (11.8%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |