Immigrants from Austria vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Austria
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Austria
Turks
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Austria vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,923,164 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Austria and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Austria | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 32.5% | 22.9% |
| Range | 31.6% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 10.0% |
| Median | 9.6% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Austria and Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Austria are Immigrants from Croatia (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Philippines (12.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (12.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |