Immigrants from Somalia vs Immigrants from Guatemala Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Somalia
Immigrants from Guatemala
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Somalia
Immigrants from Guatemala
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Somalia vs Immigrants from Guatemala Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,101,870 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Somalia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,104,369 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 0.090%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Somalia | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Minimum | 5.5% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 56.1% | 65.8% |
Range | 50.6% | 61.2% |
Mean | 19.1% | 22.1% |
Median | 17.0% | 20.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.1% | 24.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Somalia and Immigrants from Guatemala by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Somalia are British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |