Immigrants from Oceania vs Blackfeet Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Blackfeet
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Blackfeet
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Blackfeet Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,833,949 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 22.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Blackfeet |
Minimum | 1.0% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 58.6% |
Range | 11.9% | 55.5% |
Mean | 6.0% | 16.2% |
Median | 5.1% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 21.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Creek (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Spanish American (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Congo (6.1%, a difference of 0.43%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Senegal (6.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |