Immigrants from Malaysia vs Chinese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Chinese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Chinese
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Chinese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,931,356 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,588 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 6.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.037% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 10.8% | 6.4% |
Range | 10.8% | 6.0% |
Mean | 1.9% | 2.3% |
Median | 1.7% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.1% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.58% | 0.78% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.00% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Taiwanese (1.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (1.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Nepal (1.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Japan (1.9%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |