Immigrants from Malaysia vs South African Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
South African
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
South Africans
12.0%
POVERTY
72.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs South African Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,932,153 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,592 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.854 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 2.4%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | South African |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 41.8% | 54.5% |
| Range | 39.3% | 53.2% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 10.7% |
| Median | 10.4% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and South Africans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Afghan (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Syrian (12.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Icelander (11.9%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Ukraine (11.8%, a difference of 0.090%), French (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Peruvian (11.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Western Europe (11.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Yugoslavian (11.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
| French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Peruvians | 85.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
| Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
| Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
| Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |