Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from India Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from India
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from India
16.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from India Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,865,263 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,520,068 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from India |
Minimum | 2.9% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 35.8% |
Range | 27.8% | 33.8% |
Mean | 14.5% | 15.0% |
Median | 14.1% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 17.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from India by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Chinese (16.1%, a difference of 2.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 2.6%), Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and Thai (17.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Thai (17.3%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |