Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Tohono O'odham Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
Tohono O'odham
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
Tohono O'odham
19.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Tohono O'odham Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 274,906,284 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,715,136 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 25.9%, a difference of 34.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Dominican Republic | Tohono O'odham |
Minimum | 0.39% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 39.5% | 87.1% |
Range | 39.1% | 85.7% |
Mean | 21.9% | 36.5% |
Median | 21.5% | 30.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.0% | 22.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.7% | 50.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 27.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 20.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 20.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Tohono O'odham by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic are Apache (19.2%, a difference of 0.60%), Native/Alaskan (19.2%, a difference of 0.76%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Houma (20.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 3.0%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 8.6%), Pima (23.6%, a difference of 10.0%), Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 13.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |