Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Tohono O'odham Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
Tohono O'odham
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
Tohono O'odham
16.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Tohono O'odham Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 274,910,584 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.381 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,718,302 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630 and weighted average of 22.9%, a difference of 41.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Dominican Republic | Tohono O'odham |
Minimum | 5.5% | 13.4% |
Maximum | 35.1% | 93.1% |
Range | 29.5% | 79.8% |
Mean | 18.4% | 39.1% |
Median | 17.7% | 39.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 21.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.7% | 51.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 29.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 20.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 20.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Tohono O'odham by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic are Ute (16.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Dominican (16.1%, a difference of 0.65%), Black/African American (15.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Houma (16.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and Native/Alaskan (16.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Navajo (22.3%, a difference of 2.6%), Puerto Rican (22.0%, a difference of 3.9%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 10.0%), Yup'ik (20.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and Pima (20.4%, a difference of 12.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 20.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 22.0% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 22.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 22.9% |