Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Dominican Republic
Immigrants from South Central Asia
19.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 274,906,284 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,522,923 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.588 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 74.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Dominican Republic | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Minimum | 0.39% | 0.46% |
Maximum | 39.5% | 16.5% |
Range | 39.1% | 16.1% |
Mean | 21.9% | 8.1% |
Median | 21.5% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.0% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.7% | 10.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 3.6% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic are Apache (19.2%, a difference of 0.60%), Native/Alaskan (19.2%, a difference of 0.76%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Houma (20.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.99%), Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |