Immigrants from Denmark vs Ugandan Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Ugandan
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Ugandans
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
76.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Ugandan Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,428,328 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.137 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,576 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.67%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 40.0% | 26.2% |
| Range | 37.3% | 24.7% |
| Mean | 14.1% | 11.8% |
| Median | 11.7% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Ugandans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Sudanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Croatia (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Guatemala (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Cuban (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
| South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Kenyans | 78.1 /100 | #144 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 78.0 /100 | #145 | Good 11.0% |
| Koreans | 77.5 /100 | #146 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 77.3 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Sudanese | 77.1 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 76.4 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 75.1 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Cubans | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |