Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Israel Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Israel
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Israel
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
87.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Israel Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,974,563 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.88%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Israel |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 0.47% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 37.3% |
| Range | 23.5% | 36.8% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 10.3% |
| Median | 10.8% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Israel by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Russia (11.7%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are South African (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Brazil (11.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
| South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
| French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |