Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Indonesia Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Indonesia
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Indonesia
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
POVERTY
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Indonesia Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,732,170 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Indonesia |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 37.3% |
| Range | 23.5% | 36.0% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 10.8% |
| Median | 10.8% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Indonesia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Scottish (11.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Slavic (11.5%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |