Immigrants from China vs Puget Sound Salish Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Puget Sound Salish
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Puget Sound Salish
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Puget Sound Salish Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,150,573 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.57%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Puget Sound Salish |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 23.7% |
| Range | 23.5% | 20.7% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 12.4% |
| Median | 10.8% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 17.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Puget Sound Salish by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Tlingit-Haida (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |