Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,789,316 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.44%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 19.2% |
| Range | 23.5% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 9.5% |
| Median | 10.8% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |