Immigrants from China vs Ute Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Ute
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Ute
11.6%
POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Ute Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,587,979 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,697 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 45.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Ute |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 66.0% |
| Range | 23.5% | 64.0% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 22.6% |
| Median | 10.8% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 32.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 19.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 15.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 14.8% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Kiowa (16.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Paiute (16.7%, a difference of 0.96%), Central American Indian (16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Yakama (16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and Colville (16.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 18.9% |