Immigrants from Belarus vs Samoan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Samoan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Samoans
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Samoan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,053,959 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,914,322 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 0.78%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Samoan |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 24.0% | 29.9% |
Range | 22.9% | 29.4% |
Mean | 8.1% | 8.8% |
Median | 7.1% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 10.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Samoans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |