Immigrants from Belarus vs Pennsylvania German Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Pennsylvania German
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Pennsylvania Germans
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Pennsylvania German Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,053,959 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,657,746 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 3.2%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Pennsylvania German |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 24.0% | 71.9% |
Range | 22.9% | 71.1% |
Mean | 8.1% | 12.1% |
Median | 7.1% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 11.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Pennsylvania Germans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |