Inupiat vs Nonimmigrants Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Inupiat
Nonimmigrants
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Inupiat
Nonimmigrants
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
278th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Nonimmigrants Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,986,972 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 23.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,693,652 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 23.6%, a difference of 2.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Nonimmigrants |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 73.6% | 47.5% |
| Range | 65.3% | 36.9% |
| Mean | 30.3% | 21.2% |
| Median | 24.4% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.1% | 22.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Nonimmigrants by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |