Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Brazilian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Brazilians
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Brazilian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,737,995 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.865 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,153,944 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 2.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.81% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 20.6% |
| Range | 98.8% | 19.8% |
| Mean | 13.1% | 8.3% |
| Median | 8.0% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.3% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.1% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Brazilians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |