Syrian vs Brazilian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Syrian
Brazilian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Syrians
Brazilians
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Brazilian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,791,569 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,153,944 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 0.050%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Syrian | Brazilian |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 23.3% | 20.6% |
Range | 22.3% | 19.8% |
Mean | 7.7% | 8.3% |
Median | 7.4% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 9.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Syrians and Brazilians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |