Ecuadorian vs English Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
English
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
English
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
6.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs English Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,951,403 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,985,462 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752 and weighted average of 21.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | English |
Minimum | 5.9% | 13.3% |
Maximum | 63.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 57.9% | 86.7% |
Mean | 23.1% | 38.4% |
Median | 20.4% | 24.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.5% | 21.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 48.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 27.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 26.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 26.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and English by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Barbados (21.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (21.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Guamanian/Chamorro (21.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Jamaican (21.6%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from Portugal (21.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (21.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Barbadian (21.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Scottish (21.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Salvadoran (21.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
Germans | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |