Dutch West Indian vs Ute Female Poverty
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
Ute
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Dutch West Indians
Ute
17.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch West Indian vs Ute Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,761,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch West Indian | Ute |
| Minimum | 9.6% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 43.3% | 73.0% |
| Range | 33.7% | 68.4% |
| Mean | 19.7% | 23.1% |
| Median | 19.3% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.8% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians and Ute by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.33%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |