Chinese vs Ute Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
 Ute
 Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Ute
10.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Ute Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 68.0%.
 
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Ute | 
| Minimum | 3.4% | 4.6% | 
| Maximum | 25.9% | 73.0% | 
| Range | 22.5% | 68.4% | 
| Mean | 10.8% | 23.1% | 
| Median | 10.4% | 17.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 15.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 25.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 10.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 14.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 14.5% | 
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (9.9%, a difference of 5.2%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% | 
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% | 
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% | 
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% | 
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% | 
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% | 
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% | 
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% | 
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% | 
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% | 
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% | 
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% | 
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |