South African vs Ute Female Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Ute
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Ute
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Ute Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,540,648 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 36.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Ute |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 44.9% | 73.0% |
| Range | 42.4% | 68.4% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 23.1% |
| Median | 9.7% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |