Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Guatemala Female Poverty
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
Immigrants from Guatemala
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Dutch West Indians
Immigrants from Guatemala
17.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Guatemala Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,761,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,104,369 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 0.42%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch West Indian | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Minimum | 9.6% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 43.3% | 65.8% |
| Range | 33.7% | 61.2% |
| Mean | 19.7% | 22.1% |
| Median | 19.3% | 20.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.8% | 24.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians and Immigrants from Guatemala by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.33%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.090%), British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |