Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Ute
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Ute
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,903,089 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 34.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Ute |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 49.6% | 73.0% |
| Range | 46.2% | 68.4% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 23.1% |
| Median | 11.6% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |