Cajun vs Ute Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cajun
Ute
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cajuns
Ute
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Ute Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,687,613 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.765 and weighted average of 17.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 0.010%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun | Ute |
| Minimum | 5.9% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 73.0% |
| Range | 94.1% | 68.4% |
| Mean | 21.9% | 23.1% |
| Median | 18.9% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.1% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.9% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Ute by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 0.80%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 0.81%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |