Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Ute
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Ute
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,673,263 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 44.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Ute |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 21.1% | 73.0% |
| Range | 19.7% | 68.4% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 23.1% |
| Median | 10.3% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Serbia (12.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Philippines (12.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |