Immigrants from Grenada vs Ute Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Grenada
Ute
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Grenada
Ute
16.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Grenada vs Ute Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,188,736 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 3.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Grenada | Ute |
| Minimum | 0.74% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 36.5% | 73.0% |
| Range | 35.8% | 68.4% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 23.1% |
| Median | 14.3% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.4% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Grenada and Ute by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |