Bahamian vs Ute Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bahamian
Ute
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bahamians
Ute
16.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs Ute Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,629,599 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 16.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 4.8%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c3bd/6c3bdda4fdd4dcbf14fd819cb517a31ab3222471" alt="Bahamian vs Ute Female Poverty"
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bahamian | Ute |
Minimum | 2.3% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 48.8% | 73.0% |
Range | 46.5% | 68.4% |
Mean | 19.2% | 23.1% |
Median | 16.9% | 17.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 15.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.2% | 25.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bahamians and Ute by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.33%), Chippewa (16.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.52%), U.S. Virgin Islander (17.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |