Creek vs Yakama Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Creek
Yakama
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Creek
Yakama
27.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Yakama Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,486,676 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 27.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,831,112 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 28.3%, a difference of 3.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Yakama |
Minimum | 7.1% | 17.1% |
Maximum | 75.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 68.3% | 82.9% |
Mean | 35.3% | 42.1% |
Median | 34.4% | 38.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.7% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.3% | 52.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.6% | 26.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 22.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Yakama by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.88%), Apache (27.7%, a difference of 0.99%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.90%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |