Costa Rican vs Scotch-Irish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Scotch-Irish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Scotch-Irish
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Scotch-Irish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,451,633 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,595,685 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.020%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 3.2% |
| Maximum | 31.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.8% | 96.8% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 20.1% |
| Median | 9.0% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Scotch-Irish by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |