Costa Rican vs Ethiopian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Ethiopian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Ethiopians
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Ethiopian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,451,633 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,096,222 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.75%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 31.0% | 28.0% |
| Range | 29.8% | 27.0% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 10.6% |
| Median | 9.0% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Ethiopians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Hungarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |