Costa Rican vs Soviet Union Male Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Soviet Union
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Soviet Union
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
60.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Soviet Union Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,451,633 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,503,005 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.37%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 31.0% | 23.2% |
| Range | 29.8% | 22.4% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 9.1% |
| Median | 9.0% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Soviet Union by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |