Chinese vs Crow Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Crow
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Crow
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Crow Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,998,568 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 32.4%, a difference of 100.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Crow |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 15.4% |
| Maximum | 43.0% | 61.5% |
| Range | 41.7% | 46.1% |
| Mean | 16.1% | 39.3% |
| Median | 16.1% | 40.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 28.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 48.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 19.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 11.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Crow by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 2.4%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 3.7%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |