Chinese vs Jamaican Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Jamaican
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Jamaicans
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Jamaican Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,369,042 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 33.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Jamaican |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 43.0% | 50.0% |
| Range | 41.7% | 45.6% |
| Mean | 16.1% | 20.9% |
| Median | 16.1% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Icelander (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (21.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Panama (21.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
| Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
| Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
| Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
| Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |