Chinese vs Alsatian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Alsatian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Alsatians
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Alsatian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,305,024 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.587 and weighted average of 24.5%, a difference of 51.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Alsatian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 43.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 41.7% | 89.5% |
| Mean | 16.1% | 40.8% |
| Median | 16.1% | 27.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 52.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 34.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 30.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 29.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are American (24.5%, a difference of 0.080%), French American Indian (24.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Osage (24.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Hispanic or Latino (24.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.97%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |