Immigrants from Australia vs Crow Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Crow
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Crow
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Crow Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,453,715 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,998,568 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 32.4%, a difference of 67.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Crow |
Minimum | 3.5% | 15.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 61.5% |
Range | 96.5% | 46.1% |
Mean | 28.1% | 39.3% |
Median | 21.4% | 40.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 28.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 48.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 19.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 11.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Albanian (19.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Demographics Similar to Crow by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 2.4%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 3.7%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |