Bhutanese vs White/Caucasian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
White/Caucasian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Whites/Caucasians
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs White/Caucasian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,976,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,582,417 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.885 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 17.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 31.2% | 31.3% |
| Range | 28.3% | 23.2% |
| Mean | 8.9% | 14.2% |
| Median | 8.0% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 4.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Ethiopian (11.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Hungarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |